News
Who should pay the price for environmental destruction? The answer is a no-brainer for most Filipinos: corporations whose ...
Vanuatu’s ICJ win has rewritten the rulebook, and Australia’s $14.5 billion fossil subsidies may now come with legal strings attached.
The International Court of Justice has handed down its unanimous opinion on climate change. It affirms what so many of us ...
16h
Sourcing Journal on MSNWhat the International Court of Justice Climate Ruling Means for RetailThe Court affirmed that a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment is a human right, and that states have binding legal duties to mitigate climate harm under international law. For global retailers ...
Environment Secretary Raphael PM Lotilla welcomed the advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), ...
Summary: By Aria Deemie, climate change reporter with New Narratives In a historic ruling, the United Nations’ highest court ...
The International Court of Justice ruled that nations must pay reparations if they don't address the global climate damage ...
We don’t suffer from a lack of policies or plans – we suffer from poor execution because of the lack of accountability” The month of July brought a grim ...
Environment Adviser Syeda Rizwana Hasan said the recent advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on climate finance, while not legally binding, establishes a moral ...
The court, created as part of the United Nations in 1945, affirmed that countries must uphold existing international laws ...
The ruling stems from the harm island nations are suffering as sea level rises, and it opens a door for future claims for ...
Trump's attack on climate policies go against the top court's opinion, which could be used by lawyers to fight back ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results