This is part of Opinionpalooza, Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June. Alongside Amicus, we kicked things off this year by explaining How Originalism Ate the Law.

Reasoning that a 90-year-old U.S. Supreme Court precedent "controls this case and binds this court," a 2-1 appellate panel on the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia decided Tuesday to ...

After a marathon debate over whether former President Trump should be granted presidential immunity for crimes alleged by Special Counsel Jack Smith, legal experts tell Fox News Digital that most of ...

A long-standing legal doctrine often criticized by conservatives for providing federal regulators sweeping powers could be on the chopping block for the Supreme Court‘s next term. The high court ...

For 30 years, the precedent set in Campbell v. St. Tammany Parish School Board court ruling has barred government officials and librarians in Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana from removing books ...

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling in United States v. Skrmetti, which allows Tennessee to ban medical procedures to transition children, is possibly a preview of how other transgender ideology cases ...

Now that the more high-profile decisions on presidential immunity and Chevron deference are done, the Supreme Court may be setting itself up for a precedent-making term in respect of gun rights. More ...